1. Colonists engaged in a lot of acts such as the Boston tea party, which is when the colonists dressed as Indians and overboard the tea. The colonist sends advertisements to other colonists to fight and protest the redcoats.
2. There were different kinds of protest for women and men. People were poor and people were rich there were disadvantages the poor didn’t have money to buy ads nor anything to support the patriots. While the rich can do buy ads and support the patriots.
3. The violence that played in crown and colony were murders the Boston massacre and the revolution.
4. Colonists argue with the violence by angry crowds ads and put up news on the liberty tree.
Reply
kappaFlake
3/31/2014 12:51:57 am
Violence is the one thing that is never justified.Violence is The rolebehavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.No one should have to make the chose if violence
Reply
maya babb
3/31/2014 01:11:59 am
where is the information on the redcoats and british your answering a question that has something to do with the topic of violence but nothing about the war next time try to include information on the main topic about the war
Reply
KappaVDylan
4/1/2014 04:48:20 am
Exactly Maya Babb i agree with you. You need to have details to back up a statement you make. If ii dont see details i wont believe you.
KappaStephen
3/31/2014 12:53:02 am
I believe that violence is ever justified. I don’t think it is ever justified because every time violence occurred it was because of some one believed was right. For example, the Boston Tea Party happened because the colonist believed that it wasn’t right to put tax on tea. As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the government closed the harbor. Another protest was the Boston Massacre. The colonists marched because they believed that the killing of a ten-year-old boy wasn’t fair.
Even though many colonists had the same beliefs, men and woman protested differently. For example, the Daughters of Liberty, a group of patriotic women, protested against the crown by making home goods instead of buying imported goods. The Sons of Liberty were a group of patriotic men who protected the rights of the colonists.
Reply
kappavseliem
3/31/2014 01:05:28 am
yes i agree with you they just want to protest to get their way they just want to protest so more colonist to go against on what they go against
Reply
KAPPAVDuguid
4/1/2014 04:27:32 am
I agree with your agreeing and think that you have stated some valid points
Reply
kappavseliem
3/31/2014 12:55:00 am
i think the different kinds of protest the colonist engage was gong in front of the dry goods store. they wanted peoples anttention to go against theohillus
Reply
KappaBell
3/31/2014 12:55:31 am
I think that the different kinds of protest the colonists engage was going in front of the dry store,in order to get people attention to go against the Theohillus Thats i believe they do that.
Reply
kappavcristie
3/31/2014 01:10:33 am
do you have more
Reply
Kp montana Aka Kashawn Pounder
3/31/2014 12:57:04 am
In the mission part one when the boston mascare when the man had got shot and that man that had shot at him didnt get i trouble or any thing like that. And also when the british solider shot at a crowd of people the soliders didnt get arrested or anything like that so that all i have to say for now.
Reply
KAPPADuguid
3/31/2014 12:58:20 am
I don't believe that violence is EVER justified. People will only see and believe what they want to see and believe.The colonists protest in the Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre. In the Boston Tea Party, colonists protested against the British by throwing tea into the Boston Harbor. In the Boston Massacre, five men were killed and six were injured. This was because the colonists and the British soldiers had a falling out when colonists threw snowballs at the Red Coats.
The Daughters of Liberty were a Colonial American group of. These women showed their loyalty by participating in boycotts of British goods. The Sons of Liberty was an organization of American patriots. The group was formed to protect the rights of the colonists.
Violence played a massive role in the American Revolution. Both the British soldiers and the colonists believed violence was the only way to get their point across. The colonists decided to use violence after their wishes for change weren’t fulfilled.
Colonists argued about violence by presenting violence. Also, they simply stated their opinion verbally. I believe that that the only reason the colonists used violence was because they weren't getting what they wanted, as stated in my previous paragraph.
Reply
KAPPAVSMALLS
3/31/2014 01:01:02 am
I THINK THAT VIOLENCE IS SOMETIMES JUSTIFIED.I THINK THIS BECAUSE LIKE DURING THE WAR THERE WERE A LOT OF VIOLENCE AND IT WAS A BAD THING BUT THEN SOMETIMES VIOLENCE CAN BE GOOD.
Reply
KappaShaneka
3/31/2014 01:07:43 am
How is violence good if people died because of their beliefs?
Reply
Desron Williams
3/31/2014 01:05:13 am
@ Shnaeka Stephen
If violence is never justified how did the redcoats leave the colonies
Reply
KAPPAVDuguid
4/1/2014 04:32:25 am
I would like to help @ShanekaStephen answer your question... The redcoats left the colonies after the Boston Massacre was over.. When I played MISSION, after i continued as an apprentice, the redcoats left.
Reply
KappaStephen
4/1/2014 04:33:35 am
The Redcoats didn't have to be violent to get there point across, it was their choice. Some people believed in peaceful protest such as Martin Luther King and Gandhi.
Reply
King Kay
4/1/2014 04:27:55 am
i agee with hannah and maya N Kp
Reply
KappaStephen
4/1/2014 04:36:10 am
What do you agree with?
Reply
JORDAAN SCOTT
4/1/2014 04:30:00 am
Colonists who respected their country were called patriots and they often got into trouble with the crown. They would stand outside of different businesses and yell bad things. The colonists would stand on King Street and fight the redcoats. There would be times where the redcoats came into their town. This tension grew so high that it led to a big shoot out . The colonists would throw snowballs. The soldiers would threaten them with guns and other advanced weapons.
Reply
JoshuaFigueroa
4/1/2014 04:30:36 am
If violence were justified im pretty sure the Redcoats would react in a agressive way.
Reply
Dasyah
4/1/2014 04:40:01 am
I believe that violence SHOULD NEVA EVA NEVA BE JUSTIFIED
Reply
Kp Montana Aka Kashawn Pounder
4/1/2014 04:52:16 am
i agree with dasyah and i would like to say that violence isbad n if it keeps happening the human population was decreased
But to say NEVER is a strong statement. In the US, if you are saying “violence is never justified” with respect to the Baltimore riots, for example, you must also oppose all the wars and killing the US is involved in.