See the lists below for comments you can use when looking at other students' work.
What Went Well (WWW)
SPaG were checked and there are no mistakes.
The lead paragraph is clear and gives all the details necessary.
The supporting information is interesting and clearly written.
The headline/text box/photo all work to draw the reader in.
The headline is interesting and funny.
The writing uses all different types of sentences and keeps the reader interested.
The journalist used only facts and included no opinions. (will not work for a review and/or editorial)
Even better if (EBI)
Double-check SPaG because there are a few mistakes that affect the readability.
Some information in the lead paragraph doesn't seem to fit in with the 5Ws and H.
The supporting information doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the work.
The headline is unclear or could be stronger.
Sentence structure should be more varied so it is more entertaining for the reader.
Opinions are in the writing and facts are not very clear. (will not work for review and/or editorial)
What Went Well (WWW)
SPaG were checked and there are no mistakes.
The lead paragraph is clear and gives all the details necessary.
The supporting information is interesting and clearly written.
The headline/text box/photo all work to draw the reader in.
The headline is interesting and funny.
The writing uses all different types of sentences and keeps the reader interested.
The journalist used only facts and included no opinions. (will not work for a review and/or editorial)
Even better if (EBI)
Double-check SPaG because there are a few mistakes that affect the readability.
Some information in the lead paragraph doesn't seem to fit in with the 5Ws and H.
The supporting information doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the work.
The headline is unclear or could be stronger.
Sentence structure should be more varied so it is more entertaining for the reader.
Opinions are in the writing and facts are not very clear. (will not work for review and/or editorial)